- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/14632622/9786207315628.jpg)
- Author: Christine Peter
- Publisher: Our Knowledge Publishing
- ISBN-10: 6207315626
- ISBN-13: 9786207315628
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.4 cm, softcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
Reviews
Description
The subject of this article is the system of precedents based on a comparative study of the Brazilian and English models of binding constitutional precedents. The aim is to analyze the binding nature of constitutional judicial precedents interpreting fundamental rights in the two compared legal systems. Particular attention is paid to the study of the hermeneutics and concretization of fundamental rights, creating an explanatory account of how the Federal Supreme Court created its infamous jusfundamental precedents, as well as how this occurs in the English constitutional model. The study is an analytical comparison, both quantitatively (what it is) and qualitatively (what it is), of the decisions that make up the notorious jusfundamental cases of the Federal Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of England.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 20d.11:29:16
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Christine Peter
- Publisher: Our Knowledge Publishing
- ISBN-10: 6207315626
- ISBN-13: 9786207315628
- Format: 15.2 x 22.9 x 0.4 cm, softcover
- Language: English English
The subject of this article is the system of precedents based on a comparative study of the Brazilian and English models of binding constitutional precedents. The aim is to analyze the binding nature of constitutional judicial precedents interpreting fundamental rights in the two compared legal systems. Particular attention is paid to the study of the hermeneutics and concretization of fundamental rights, creating an explanatory account of how the Federal Supreme Court created its infamous jusfundamental precedents, as well as how this occurs in the English constitutional model. The study is an analytical comparison, both quantitatively (what it is) and qualitatively (what it is), of the decisions that make up the notorious jusfundamental cases of the Federal Supreme Court and the Supreme Court of England.
Reviews